We just saw Tatum and Celtics handle the Luka and the Lakers. Let’s get straight to the point. Two NBA stars, two signature shoes, each with their strengths and weaknesses. Here’s the direct comparison between Jayson Tatum’s Jordan Tatum 3 and Luka Dončić’s Jordan Luka 3.

DESIGN: REFINED VS BOLD

Tatum 3: Clean, sharp, and efficient – reflecting JT’s game. The silhouette offers elegant lines with minimal distractions. Celtics colorways pop without being excessive, and the design transitions smoothly from court to street.

Luka 3: More experimental with a distinctive midfoot strap and chunkier profile. The design makes a statement, much like Luka’s creative playing style. Dallas-inspired colorways feature prominently, and technology is more visible throughout.

VERDICT: Tatum 3 for understated versatility; Luka 3 if you want to make a statement.

DURABILITY: CONSISTENT VS SPECIALIZED

Tatum 3: Built with reinforced toe caps and heel counters that maintain integrity even after extensive play. The engineered mesh shows minimal wear at stress points, and the firmer outsole rubber resists breakdown, especially for outdoor use.

Luka 3: Prioritizes durability in lateral support structures for step-back moves. The slightly softer outsole compound shows earlier signs of wear outdoors, though the upper materials hold up well. The strap system may loosen slightly over time.

VERDICT: Tatum 3 edges out with better all-around durability, especially for multi-surface players.

WEIGHT: NIMBLE VS SUBSTANTIAL

Tatum 3: Lighter at 12.2 oz (size 9), distributing weight evenly throughout. The streamlined construction promotes quickness and vertical movement without feeling flimsy.

Luka 3: Heavier at 13.8 oz (size 9), with additional weight in the midfoot and heel. This deliberate distribution enhances stability during deceleration but comes at the cost of perceived quickness.

VERDICT: Tatum 3 wins for players prioritizing agility and quick movements.

GRIP: VERSATILE VS SPECIALIZED

Tatum 3: Features multidirectional herringbone that delivers reliable traction across various court conditions. The firmer rubber requires less frequent wiping but takes longer to break in fully. Consistent performance on both clean and dusty courts.

Luka 3: Employs a radial pattern optimized for pivoting and step-back moves. The softer rubber provides exceptional initial grip on clean courts but collects dust more quickly, requiring more maintenance during play.

VERDICT: Tatum 3 for all-around consistency; Luka 3 for peak performance on well-maintained courts.

PRICE: ACCESSIBLE VS PREMIUM

Tatum 3: $130 retail positions it as an accessible signature shoe with solid performance features. Sales can bring the price down to around $110.

Luka 3: Commands $140, justifying the premium with its additional support features and complex cushioning system. Limited editions can reach $160+.

VERDICT: Tatum 3 offers slightly better value for comparable performance.

THE BOTTOM LINE

The Tatum 3 comes out ahead with its combination of versatile performance, lighter weight, and better value. It’s the more practical choice for most players who want a reliable performer across different environments.

The Luka 3 excels for players who prioritize cushioning and support for deceleration moves. Its specialized design features make it worth the extra investment if your game resembles Dončić’s style.

Your choice ultimately depends on playing style and preferences—just like team allegiances. Both shoes deliver signature-level performance, but the Tatum 3’s versatility gives it the slight edge in this matchup.